
Writing this article has been like sailing without a rudder. I've ranged over
an ocean of possibilities, directed here and there by the winds of my
imagination; I've held on tight in the high winds of my ignorance about
issues vital to this discussion; I've sat becalmed in the stagnant waters
of my own biases; I've let the Divine lead me as I teased out the fundamental
from a bewildering sea of inconsistency and controversy.
A practicing Dianic for nine years, this journey has shown me that I have been
harboring resistance to the validity of polarity magic and feeling threatened
by those who believe it essential to Wiccan magical practice. I've enacted my
own version, if you will, of the "other face" of polarity - the resistance
patterns that occur when like poles of a magnet encounter each other. I have
come to see both the dysfunction and the piece of truth in my resistance and
hope to be able to share both perspectives here.
I've adopted a "whatever floats your boat" approach to cosmology as a valid
means of embracing magically-diverse systems. I argue that this discussion
is not about an "either/or" situation (polarity-magic or same-sex magic) but
about a "both/and" reality (these two systems and many, many more). I hope
the reader will conclude with me that polarity magic is one of many valid
theoretical systems, and that there is no reasonable basis for a "One True Way"
position within the Craft.
Magic is magick is majik, and in a universe as diverse as the one the Goddess
has created for us, there is room for many cosmologies, many explanations of
how things work. Haven't we learned from Mother Earth that diversity does not
diminish but strengthens the webs we weave? The laissez-faire attitude I have
adopted toward cosmological diversity isn't an abdication of my reasoning
skills or of the evidence of my senses in terms of my own magical experiences.
Fundamentally, I have come to understand that as long as we argue about whose
cosmology is better than whose, we waste our collective energies in the face
of much greater needs.
The kernel of truth in my now forsaken resistance to polarity-magic theory is
this: any person or group who holds that theirs is the only way scares me,
whether they be Christian, Muslim, Wiccan, neopagan or atheist. Orthodoxy
breeds fundamentalism. "An it harm none, do as you will" seems an excellent
model for embracing the diversity of magical theories and practices among us.
All practitioners of magic are developing a craft that works for them, that
carries them where they want to go. As long as your boat floats, I say hoist
your sail, crank your engine, take up your long pole, paddle on.

By the time I found my way to Goddess and then witchcraft as feminist
spirituality, I had missed all seven of the Defining/Developing Dianic Wicca
conferences hostessed by the Re-formed Congregation of the Goddess (RCG-I) in
the 1980s and early 1990s. So, I interviewed Jade River, Consistery Executive
of RCG, about the primary conclusions drawn from these conferences. Among
hundreds of women and over seven years, there was much disagreement about what
Dianism is. Consensus developed on two points only: Goddess and feminism are
essential ingredients of this largely self-defined spiritual system with its
diversity of beliefs and practices.
Conference organizers were perhaps surprised, as you may be, to observe that
a majority of women who identify as Dianic are practicing heterosexuals. This
continues to be true of the Dianic population. It is clear that many women
find value in same-sex spiritual practice, a practice that has nothing to do
with sexual attraction. Z Budapest, mother of feminist spirituality and the
Goddess Movement in the United States, says Dianism is about Women's Mysteries,
blood mysteries, and not about who one chooses to sleep with.
Too often Dianics are stereotyped by both women and men working in other
traditions as man-hating lesbians. This is as descriptive of Dianics as
calling Gardnerians lesbian-hating fundamentalists or Shamanic Wiccans
cultural rip-off artists. Isn't it time we dropped these internecine wars?
All they do is demonstrate our own ignorance and bigotry and divert us from
the primary task at hand - healing the world of the abuses and rigidity of
the monotheistic hate-mongers who would, in some cases, rather stone us than
dialogue with us, rather keep their children out of the military than serve
country alongside us.
Dianism is not monoculture. There are McFarland Dianics (a mixed-gender
tradition unlike most other Dianic trads), separatist Dianics, Dianic Wiccans,
non-Wiccan Dianics, pagan Dianics, cultural Dianics (Celtic, Italian, Norse,
Teutonic, African), eclectic Dianics, bi-traditional Dianics, and
AnarchaFeministDianics, women who remind us of core feminist values, such as
the development of non-hierarchical structures and consensus decision-making
as tools for a truly humanist, egalitarian culture.
I prefer to practice my spirituality in either solitary or Women's Mysteries
modes. I claim historical bases for this practice and understand the social
realities that necessitate women having our own spaces for empowering ourselves.
At the same time, I have not been able to ignore the seeming disconnection
between a separatist practice and a spiritual model (Goddess) to which holism
is fundamental.
Kostya Branwen Sudice, a contemporary AnarchaFeministDianic scholar, has
articulated a model for community that is inclusive, egalitarian,
choice-based - a model we pagans could adapt to our differing traditions
and values. She writes:
"In a near-perfect society I can imagine omni-racial, omni-generational,
omni-abled, classless communities of women, living and co-operating socially
and economically beside communities of men and omni-gendered communities.
People could live as they are most comfortable living among those with whom
they feel affinity. This would in no way mandate inequality in a
non-hierarchical society. And, these communities could have fluid populations
as people's affinities changed and evolved over however short or long a period.
This is quite different from a Separatist philosophy which presupposes total
social and economic severance. This is a Cultural and Eco-Feminist philosophy
which honors diversity." (http://www.pinn.net/~kostya/GP/miasmatic.html)

The theory of polarity and of compulsory or desirable male-female partnering
in magical work comes to us from Egyptian and Hebrew (Qabala) mysticism. Janet
and Stewart Farrar, in A Witches Bible Compleat, Volume 2, state that
"The rationale of Wicca, as we see it, rests on two fundamental principles:
the Theory of Levels and the Theory of Polarity." In Stewart's book What
Witches Do, he goes further: "To the witch, everything is a web of balancing
opposites - positive and negative, male and female, light and darkness.
Without these counterpoises, the universe would collapse. This outlook...
is basically that of the modern scientist..."
Other historical, cultural, cosmo-mythological and scientific systems inform
Goddess religion. The "most popular goddess in Greece among the peasantry,"
(E.O. James, The Cult of the Mother Goddess), Artemis was never partnered with
one of the gods of the invading Indo-Europeans who conquered the pre-Hellenic
Greeks and transformed the indigenous culture from matrifocal to patrifocal.
Artemis claimed as Her birthright a same-sex lifestyle and played, hunted and
made magic under the full moon with scores of nymphs who agreed to forsake
relations with men in order to run with Artemis.
The post-invasion myths of classical Greece wed the god of the conquerors,
Zeus, to the Great Mother Goddess Hera (and coupled him with just about every
other goddess at hand). Even so, Hestia and Athena also managed to retain
their "virgin" (possessed of themselves) status, despite the Indo-European
insistence on god-goddess coupling. Feminist scholars reason that the worship
of these goddesses was so fundamental to the conquered peoples that they
resisted the attempts of the invaders to alter their fundamental nature. Can
we agree that these three Greek goddesses, among countless others from other
pantheons, offer valid, traditional, non-polarized options for Goddess
worshippers?

As for scientific theory and Wicca, most scholars, teachers and other adepts
agree that magic works according to natural law or the universal or fundamental
principles to which the Farrars refer above. Consider the following
perspectives from several different traditions:
Edain McCoy, in Making Magick (a work on natural magick), quotes 19th century
ceremonial magician Aleister Crowley's definition of magick: "Magick is the
science and art of causing change to occur in conformity to will." She then
writes, "The use of the word 'science' in Crowley's definition is telling.
The natural laws of the universe are fixed. They cannot be defied, even
through magick. Therefore all magickal energy has to conform to these laws."
Starhawk, in The Spiral Dance, states that the witch's view of the universe
"as an interplay of moving forces·corresponds to an amazing degree with the
view of modern physics·."
Amber K, in True Magick, tells us that "Magick is based on certain premises
called 'Laws of Magick'·akin to the laws of physics·. We might sum up the
laws of magick by saying that energy is abundant, everything is connected,
possibilities are infinite, the path lies within you." Although there are
some differences in the above observations, the authors assert in common a
necessary relationship between magical theory and scientific theory, most
often referring to the laws of physics. These magicoscientific theoretical
systems are supported by a proliferation of theoretical work over the last
thirty years, linking the "new" physics and other contemporary scientific
disciplines with the eastern spiritual cosmologies of Buddhism, Hinduism
and Taoism, spiritual systems that have become increasingly popular in the
west in the last half-century.
Fascinated by and to some degree skeptical of the claims that Wiccan magic
works according to natural law, my nine-year journey as a witch has included
reading the "new sciences," wanting to believe that our worldview is as
organic as it claims to be. What I've heard from Dianics is that a witch's
cosmology is the foundation of her magic, and that a witch's cosmology can
be anything she imagines it to be. De-Anna Alba, in her book The Cauldron of
Change, offers a theory of magic that is in harmony with this Dianic take on
things: She says, "At its roots, the ability to do Magick (to create our own
reality) exists because we believe it does. There is some evidence to support
our belief.
The most convincing evidence comes from the scientific realm of
particle physics, and is called the Heisenberg Principle of Uncertainty." She
explains, "We can either see the speed at which (sub-atomic particles) travel
or we can see their location. We cannot see both at once. Which phenomenon
gets seen is entirely dependent on which the observer chooses to see. It is
not determined by the particles themselves. It is determined by the observer.
If we can make these choices at the sub-atomic level, at the level of the
building blocks of nature, surely we can use those building blocks to create
whatever reality we wish."
In terms of the laws of physics, four basic universal forces have been
identified: electromagnetism, gravity, strong nuclear forces and weak nuclear
forces. The concept of polarity magic is derived from electromagnetic theory
and is thus validated as a "laws of nature" magical system. Electricity travels
between positive and negative poles, a fact of physical reality, though
certainly some adept at some time has reversed or interrupted the flow of
electrical energy, just as some adepts have seemingly defied the law of
gravity by levitating.
The law of physics I am most attracted to comes from superstring theory
(see The Elegant Universe by Brian R. Greene, for example), a fairly recent
theory that promises to solve a troubling puzzle in the new physics - the
seeming incompatibility of relativity theory (macrocosmic reality, how time
and space curve) and quantum mechanics (microcosmic reality, how things work
inside the atom, at the sub-atomic level). While I do not yet understand
string theory enough to describe how it overcomes this puzzle and gives the
key to making both relativity and quantum mechanics work within a unified
theory, I can tell you this: it describes the physics of what witches call
"sympathetic magic," the form of magic many claim as the basis of Dianic
practice.
Superstring theory (being cautiously touted by some physicists as the T.O.E.
or Theory of Everything) tells us that the subatomic particles identified as
the basic building blocks of nature are not quite what we think. Instead of
being distinct pieces of matter with varying properties, particles are
actually strings or membranes of energy, all identical but vibrating at
different frequencies. The varying frequency rates determine the manifest
aspects of matter that we experience as being distinct, separate, different.
To use superstring theory as a "laws of nature" basis of sympathetic magic,
one could say that in this magical system the practitioner works to come into
alignment with, or attune to, the vibrational frequencies of that which one
wishes to manifest. In this theory, we also have a scientific basis for
understanding the law of cause and effect: whatever we put out (the
vibrational frequencies we generate) comes back to us (attract to them
other membranes vibrating at the same frequency).
If this theory of vibrational attunement is correct, one could derive from
it a cautionary tale for all practitioners of magic: be careful of your
cosmology, because it too has its causality and resonating effects.
Specifically, there are two issues we might do well to consider: first,
is there a more efficacious basis for our magic than the one we are currently
using? second, insisting on any one theoretical framework as a required basis
for magic ignores all the other possibilities and puts neopagans in the
unenviable place of fundamentalists who say something like, "It is so because
our tradition says it is so. All who disbelieve are not true believers."

Balance is seen to be an integral part of polarity magic. Magic happens when
the energy flowing between negative and positive poles creates a point of
balance. Many Dianics are proponents of "balance in all things." Balance is
one of the major preoccupations of New Agers, and I have long been a relative
lone wolf decrying this insistence on valuing one point of a continuum above
all others. In the natural world, we see that balance and imbalance are points
on a continuum of fluctuating motion, much like the seesaw that moves back and
forth between ground and sky when two children sit on opposite ends of it.
I have tried to find evidence within natural law for or against balance as a
necessary part of magic. While my search has been anything but exhaustive, the
most telling statement I have found regarding balance comes from geobiology,
Gaia theory and the work of Elisabet Sahtouris (Gaia, the Human Journey from
Chaos to Cosmos, a book which is out of print but now available online, with
new chapters and a new title, Earthdance, Living Systems in Evolution). In an
early chapter she describes the origin of the universe and tells us that the
spiral, one of the basic universal energy forms and one found in many creation
myths, describes the shape of galaxies and their predecessors, protogalaxies.
These spirals of stardust occur because of imbalance! "A modern scientist·sees
such protogalaxies as the natural result of imbalances and forces in the great
cosmic energy field - a swirling of disorderly or chaotic matter into orderly
or cosmic patterns·." The basic movement of matter is such that heavy and
light atoms move away from each other, creating an imbalance in the
distribution of matter that results in the spiral shape found in galaxies,
whirlpools, tornadoes, hurricanes and DNA strands.
Systems theory talks of complexity, of the dynamics that structure systems.
From a systems perspective, balance and imbalance are points on a continuum,
energies of fluctuation that support living systems, where order arises out of
chaos, and chaos out of order, a living dance of energy in motion. A magical
theory that values balance over other points on a continuum of fluctuation is
a magical theory that may be truncated, that may miss the complexities of
natural systems.

There is an area of seeming gender imbalance within paganism which I want to
address. In contemporary paganism we tend to enact two kinds of mysteries,
Women's Mysteries (for women only), and, for lack of a better phrase,
Mixed-Gender Mysteries. What I don't see happening is a Men's Mysteries
movement, and I'm curious about that. What is it about men's relationships
to each other and to deity, male or female, that discourages a male-only
experience?
Is Goddess religion truly "women's business" as some of our pagan
forefathers believed? Merlin Stone, in When God Was a Woman, quotes
historian Jacquetta Hawkes on the freedoms of women in classical Greece,
referring to "the liberation of the ancient cults (where) respectable
matrons and girls in large companies would spend whole nights on the bare
hills in dances which stimulated ecstasy, and in intoxication, perhaps
partly alcoholic, but mainly mystical (with) husbands (who) disapproved,
but, it is said, did not like to interfere in religious matters."
Finally, a look at where we are coming from and where we are headed seems
an appropriate conclusion to this discussion. We are the human products of
the Piscean Age, an age characterized by dualism and "either/or" thinking.
Theories based on pairs of opposites have proliferated and taken root during
this time. The coming Age of Aquarius brings a perspective that promises to
move us beyond a "pairs of opposites" view of the world. There is disagreement
about the exact dates of the Age of Aquarius, but most believe we are living
on the cusp of it. Fortunately, we pagans have a model for the Aquarian Age -
the encompassing nature of Goddess, She who is soother of souls, destroyer,
queen, hand-maiden, full moon and dark, brilliant sun, the shadow times of
dawn and dusk, the manifest world, the void. She is Dark Goddess, Death
Mother, Midwife, Light-Bearer. She is whole unto herself, the ground of being.
She carries all potential, male, female, hermaphrodite and other. She
manifests all living through sexual and asexual reproduction. She is
black, white, the colors of the rainbow, and all shades of gray.
In Goddess mythocosmology, She weaves the web of life, an interconnection of
distinct nodes, the whole made of its parts, of polarity-balance-chaos, of
maiden-mother-crone, of born-generating-dying god. The wave of the future
is inclusion, egalitarianism, complexity and continuum. We pagans, of all
stripes, will do well to ride it. A "whatever floats your boat" approach to
differences in magical theories and practices may help us get the boat into
the water.

| BACK | NEXT |
|---|
| HOME |
|---|